This assignment has two parts, which will be submitted in one document.

For this task, you will calculate the mean, median, and mode for a fictitious data set. These data represent the results of a fictitious study, which investigates whether a new drug (Drug A) is more effective than a placebo (i.e., an inactive substance) in the treatment of depression. The researcher is also interested in whether the effects of the drug varies by age so participants between the ages of 18-39 years were recruited (the younger adult group), and participants between the ages of 60-80 years were recruited (the older adult group). Participants were randomly assigned to either the placebo group or to the drug group (Drug A). All participants were first screened to ensure they met the criteria for depression. After 2 months of taking either the placebo or Drug A, participants returned to the lab and completed a measure of depressive symptomology called the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II).

<

Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the "Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics" template. (see template attached). While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Article evaluation (DA & Logistic Regression article evaluation) has the purpose to expose to how to write and reports each statistical technique. The evaluation (2 pages) must covered the following issues:

a. Justification for the use of the technique.

b. Evidence of data screening and assumptions tested.

c. Quality of the results presentation with complete information needed to evaluate the result.

d. Discussion of results supported by the information offered.

e. Suggestions for improving the report.

In the attachment, the DA & Logistic Regression article to be evaluated.

For more information this is the TEXTBOOK:

Mertler and Vannatta, (2017). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. Six edition. New York: Routledge.

Article evaluation ( EFA article evaluation) has the purpose to expose to how to write and reports each statistical technique. The evaluation (2 pages) must covered the following issues:

a. Justification for the use of the technique.

b. Evidence of data screening and assumptions tested.

c. Quality of the results presentation with complete information needed to evaluate the result.

d. Discussion of results supported by the information offered.

e. Suggestions for improving the report.

In the attachment, the - EFA article to be evaluated.

For more information this is the TEXTBOOK:

Mertler and Vannatta, (2017). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. Six edition. New York: Routledge.

Article evaluation (LR & Path Analysis article evaluation) has the purpose to expose to how to write and reports each statistical technique. The evaluation (2 pages) must covered the following issues:

a. Justification for the use of the technique.

b. Evidence of data screening and assumptions tested.

c. Quality of the results presentation with complete information needed to evaluate the result.

d. Discussion of results supported by the information offered.

e. Suggestions for improving the report.

In the attachment, the LR & Path Analysis article to be evaluated.

For more information this is the TEXTBOOK:

Mertler and Vannatta, (2017). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. Six edition. New York: Routledge.

Article evaluation (ANOVA & MLR article evaluation) has the purpose to expose to how to write and reports each statistical technique. The evaluation (2 pages) must covered the following issues:

a. Justification for the use of the technique.

b. Evidence of data screening and assumptions tested.

c. Quality of the results presentation with complete information needed to evaluate the result.

d. Discussion of results supported by the information offered.

e. Suggestions for improving the report.

In the attachment, the ANOVA & MLR article.

For more information this is the TEXTBOOK:

Mertler and Vannatta, (2017). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. Six edition. New York: Routledge.

Article evaluation (Factorial ANOVA article evaluation) has the purpose to expose to how to write and reports each statistical technique. The evaluation (2 pages) must covered the following issues:

a. Justification for the use of the technique.

b. Evidence of data screening and assumptions tested.

c. Quality of the results presentation with complete information needed to evaluate the result.

d. Discussion of results supported by the information offered.

e. Suggestions for improving the report.

In the attachment, the article that I want to be evaluated.

For more information this is the TEXTBOOK:

Mertler and Vannatta, (2017). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods. Six edition. New York: Routledge.

Using the data on the "National Cancer Institute Data" Excel spreadsheet, calculate the descriptive statistics indicated below for each of the Race/Ethnicity groups. Refer to your textbook and the Topic Materials, as needed, for assistance with creating Excel formulas.

Provide the following descriptive statistics:

Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median, and Mode

Measures of Variation: Variance, Standard Deviation, and Range (a formula is not needed for Range).

Once the data is calculated, provide a 150-250 word analysis of the descriptive statistics on the spreadsheet. This should include differences and health outcomes between groups. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Using the data on the "National Cancer Institute Data" Excel spreadsheet, calculate the descriptive statistics indicated below for each of the Race/Ethnicity groups. Refer to your textbook and the Topic Materials, as needed, for assistance with creating Excel formulas.

Provide the following descriptive statistics:

Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median, and Mode

Measures of Variation: Variance, Standard Deviation, and Range (a formula is not needed for Range).

Once the data is calculated, provide a 150-250 word analysis of the descriptive statistics on the spreadsheet. This should include differences and health outcomes between groups. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You'll have to have SAS JMP already to conduct this report, if you don't have it then please don't put in a bid.

You are required to explore your chosen dataset and provide a textual and visual narrative for the benefit of your of your managers. They want to see a combination of incisive data analysis and effective information visualisation to convey a compelling narrative, which will inform future decision-making.

This narrative will be in the form of an individual report. To provide a more complete treatment, you are required to use both MS Excel and SAS JMP to generate the analyses. Multiple screenshots from both packages are expected. The following elements should be present in some form:

Descriptive Statistics on the key elements of the data; This can be done in Excel, but JMP is a good option to consider here.

Effective data visualisation, i.e., graphs, charts, pivot tables, and (specifically in Excel), cell formatting.