support@topuniversitypapers.com

+1(316)4441378

+44-141-628-6690

Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category

Any topic (writer’s choice)

INSTRUCTIONS:
This assignment consists of a short essay question, and a short response question. The main intent of these questions is to ensure that you have a sound grasp of the fundamentals of the material presented in this unit. To that end, there is a 3 to 4 page (1000 words) limit for the short essay question. Im not so concerned with whether you agree with a particular author or not. The quality of your answer is based on your exposition of the competing positions, your comparative analysis of those positions and, lastly, your argument in support of the position you defend.

As with all the assignments in this course, the short essay question is not designed to be a research question. There is no requirement to get material from external sources such as other authors, or reference websites, who have summarized, or criticized, the authors you are dealing with. In effect, including such material defeats your purpose in completing your essay because you are essentially tel

John Locke The social contract Theory

Students
will present a research paper written and documented in Turabian style to class at a time
relative to the political thinker on an agreed topic related to a significant thinker or political
issue addressed in our study. Each paper should include several professional sources only,
including primary sources, documented books, and at least four peer-reviewed journal
articles (no webpage or blog sources, no encyclopedias). Each written review/analysis must be
double-spaced, typed in normal type size (similar to this syllabus, Book Antiqua size 11 font
best). This paper must be written in Turabian Bibliographic style, with a Title Page, Footnotes
documenting sources used in each paragraph, and a Works Cited page.

Killing Animals for Sports

**ATTACHMENTS OF READINGS ARE TO BE USED AND REFERENCED FOR THE PAPER**
Purpose: This assignment will require you to develop a position on the ethics of hunting animals for sport. It will help you improve your ability to research, think critically about real-world issues, and ultimately develop a compelling argument. It will allow you another opportunity to translate your (presumably) complex thoughts into clear, concise, and organized writing. By the end of this assignment, you will have developed more tools to approach ethical issues that arise in your future academic and professional careers.

Assignment

You will take a position on whether or not it is moral to hunt animals for sport. Find and appropriately cite scholarly articles (peer-reviewed) to support your stance and the relevant counterarguments. Then you will respond to objections and rebuttals to your position.

Formatting Requirements

Double-spaced
12 pt font, Times New Roman
3-4 pages (n

Killing Animals for Sports

**ATTACHMENTS OF READINGS ARE TO BE USED AND REFERENCED FOR THE PAPER**
Purpose: This assignment will require you to develop a position on the ethics of hunting animals for sport. It will help you improve your ability to research, think critically about real-world issues, and ultimately develop a compelling argument. It will allow you another opportunity to translate your (presumably) complex thoughts into clear, concise, and organized writing. By the end of this assignment, you will have developed more tools to approach ethical issues that arise in your future academic and professional careers.

Assignment

You will take a position on whether or not it is moral to hunt animals for sport. Find and appropriately cite scholarly articles (peer-reviewed) to support your stance and the relevant counterarguments. Then you will respond to objections and rebuttals to your position.

Formatting Requirements

Double-spaced
12 pt font, Times New Roman
3-4 pages (n

Global perspectives

Please answer the  Task 1, 2 questions given on the green slides. Please while answering the questions I'm 18 first year of university in London. Before I was in a boarding school in Switzerland and before I used to study back home(Turkey, Ankara) Don't be to specific. On the second task the topics u can discuss about is race(racism) and sexual orientation . Please don't use very complexed vocabulary since I'm not a native English speaker. Do critical thinking and fin interesting examples please. Please answer the second task more detailed then the first and make sure to follow exact instructions.

Killing Animals for Sports

**Attachments of readings are to be read and cited and used for the paper**

Purpose: This assignment will require you to develop a position on the ethics of hunting animals for sport. It will help you improve your ability to research, think critically about real-world issues, and ultimately develop a compelling argument. It will allow you another opportunity to translate your (presumably) complex thoughts into clear, concise, and organized writing. By the end of this assignment, you will have developed more tools to approach ethical issues that arise in your future academic and professional careers.

Assignment

You will take a position on whether or not it is moral to hunt animals for sport. Find and appropriately cite scholarly articles (peer-reviewed) to support your stance and the relevant counterarguments. Then you will respond to objections and rebuttals to your position.

Formatting Requirements

Double-spaced
12 pt font, Times New Roman
3-4

The examined life

*argue for what value the philosophical practice of self-examination has for the person who engages in it, and explain what complications may result from this practice

*explain what value a philosopher might have for society as a whole

*detail how you have engaged in philosophical practice in your life, and what the results have been
(in the this section only, you can use 1st person)

MAX length: 3 pages

In your essay be sure you:
-Give an introduction that orients your reader to the context of your essay
-Address the 3 Writing Requirements in the order presented on the prompt, in a minimum of 1 paragraph for each WR
-Cite directly from both The Apology (in 2.4) and The Value of Philosophy (in 1.6) to support, exemplify, or extend your arguments and explanations
-Make clear, concise arguments and explanations, using appropriate reasons and evidence
-Cite specific examples of your own experience in WR 3
-Give an appropriate conclusion to

Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics

Please read the assigned reading and write 5 pages talking about it using no outside sources whatsoever. Please be creative and insightful, bring forward important points to the discussion and no plagiarism please. This is a very important paper and it is simple but yet should be powerful. Thank you

Social and Political Philosophy

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
FALL 2020
MIDTERM EXAM
Discuss either IA or IB, and either IIA or IIB. In each case, make sense of the authors/
authors positions and reasoning. Aim for 4-5 pages (double-spaced) for each essay
(approximately 8-10 pages total).
Youre expected to make use of the class lectures, readings, and discussions. Those are
the materials youre being examined on. Support your views of the authors positions
and reasoning with brief quotations; you neednt include a formal bibliography, but you
should refer to sources and page numbers in the text of your essay, e.g., as Rousseau
reasoned in Bk I, Chapt 2 of On the Social Contract or (Rousseau, Bk I, Chapt 2).
Your essays will be due on Monday, November 2 at 5 p.m., your local time. (Canvas will
have a due date of 5 p.m. PST, but Ill take your time zone into account to determine
whether you submitted on time. Submit by 5 p.m. where you are.)
Save both essays as o

Philosophy of Law

Natural law theorists argue that law is necessarily moral; legal positivists argue that it is not. Write a four-paragraph essay on whether law is necessarily moral.

The structure of this assignment is the following:

If you want to argue that law is necessarily moral:
Paragraph 1: Legal positivists argue that law is not necessarily moral because
Paragraph 2: I say that law is necessarily moral because
Paragraph 3: One might object that
Paragraph 4: I reply that

If you want to argue that law is not necessarily moral:
Paragraph 1: Natural law theorists argue that law is necessarily moral because
Paragraph 2: I say that law is not necessarily moral because
Paragraph 3: One might object that
Paragraph 4: I reply that

Notes:
(i) The format of this assignment is essentially the same as the last one, except that it is expanded from four sentences to four paragraphs. You need to elaborate the arguments in greater detail, but you still need