The Assignment is about the first and third debates. you should analyze it according to the questions attached. Also%u0428%u040A I have attached the chapters which talk about Individual,state,system level and Hamiltonian,Jeffersonian,Wilsonian,Jacksonian schools. You should connect these ideas to the Clinton and Trump point of view.
According to the questions 4 and 5 in the assignment outline. In the fourth question for example you should say : I think that Clinton is more liberal than realist because in this topic she gives or she said a liberal respondents like ...."more than one idea she gave"..... etc.
Question 5 , you need to give some policies examples of two candidates and explain to which school it belongs.
Write the assignment in an easy and clear way and don't make a complex sentence with difficult vocabulary.
Discuss how humanitarianism succeeded or failed in one of the following three incidents: Somalia, Checyna, or Yugoslav. Discuss whther Humanitarian efforts succeeded or failed, and put the efforts into a global political context. Preferably from a neutral viewpoint. Needs to be cited Harvard Style, the Bibliography doesn't count towards the word count. No source minimum, would prefer three though.
Prepare a PowerPoint Presentation of 6 to 8 slides addressing the following: Identify and explain four (4) key attributes of Larry Frymire’s leadership style. Identify and explain four (4) major influences from the tug-of-war between Frymire’s role as leader and the newly elected governor. Select and assess four .
This is a continuation of the first assignment. Choose one (1) of the two (2) policies that you used in Assignment 1 and continue your research and analysis for Assignment 2.
Submit your Assignment 1 revision based on your professor’s feedback. Then, write a 4-5 page paper in which you:
1. Write a one-page summary of the policy, including the purpose, the context of the problem, and any recommendations or suggestions from the policy to address the problem. (Use your summary skills to keep this to one page.)
2. Explain who all the players are – official and unofficial, and interest groups – involved with your policy.
3. Describe the role and function of each of the players you identified.
4. Of the list of players you identified, pick two (2) and describe the political influence of each player, explaining motives, conflicts, interrelationships, and impacts on the policy.
- Use three to four (3-
Need a tutorial for this paper
Week 2 individual assignmnet Federalism Paper
Prepare a 700-1,050-word paper examining the significance of federalism in the United States today. Focus your paper on a specific area, such as healthcare, transportation, homeland security, etc. In your paper, describe the development of federalism and how the various levels of government relate to your chosen topic. Be prepared to discuss your paper in class. The paper should be submitted in proper APA format/style with appropriate citation, formatting and grammar and submitted as an attachment in Microsoft Word through the Assignment Link for our course. Be sure to integrate, use, apply and cite the course text, concepts, theories and reference the course learning throughout your writing and critical analysis.
Refer the Scenario for Assignments 1–5. Prepare a variance report for the selected agency. Refer to Table 8.4 in Chapter 8 (page 133).
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper addressing the criteria below.
(Note: Change the title of the report to reflect the selected agency’s name and the years to 2013-2014.)
- Find the variances for both the revenue and expenditures sides and then discuss two to three (2-3) problematic areas for the agency. Provide the results of the variances in a table (Excel or Word).
- Recommend two (2) policy actions for each problematic area discussed in criterion 1. Justify the recommendations.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a co
Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper, describing how politically powerful factions compete in policy decisions and debate issues. You could examine environmentalists versus big business or alternate energy sources versus more oil drilling.
· Select a contemporary issue that has polarizing viewpoints, such as environmental policy, taxation and income redistribution, same-sex marriage, worker’s rights, immigration, and so forth.
· Are either or both leaving the national interest aside in favor of their own? o What is your conclusion about the best answer to the issue?
· Provide your assessment of whether or not the opposition you described has contributed to a healthy debate. Consider the following questions: o Has the opposition moved toward consensus or polarization in public opinion?
· Evaluate theoretical perspectives, such as pluralism, state autonomy, or elitism, and explain factionalism in support of and opposition to your issue.
Format your paper according to
Due Week 7 and worth 370 points
Research, review and analyze
Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989).
Based on your research and the case, write a 5-6 page paper in which you:
- Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):
- Facts of the case
- Issues
- Rule
- Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.
- Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.
- Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.
- Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
- Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
- Provide at least four (4) additional court cases that support your analysis.
he Paper seeks to answer and critically analyse the questions and statements below. It does so by giving a well researched two pages paper in APA format. -Who is responsible the chief responsibility for the US, education? - Consider the cahnges in the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) over the years. - Which values are consider
Are Political Parties Beneficial or Detrimental? Write a 2 to 3 page, APA style paper, arguing why you believe political parties are beneficial or detrimental. In your paper also include the opposing position along with your rebuttal (of that opposing position). For instance, if you wrote a paper arguing that political parties are beneficial (and why), then your rebuttal would be that political parties are detrimental (damaging or harmful) and why. Note: Arguing in a paper means to present reasons for or against a thing. For instance: He argued in favor of political parties or she argued against political parties. Then give your reasons in your paper to support your arguments!
